[SAC-HELP] Re: sac-help Digest, Vol 16, Issue 7
Juan M Gomez
gomez at geociencias.unam.mx
Thu Oct 19 16:14:03 PDT 2006
Hi there,
The SAC binary work well also on a AMD-64 PC, however, there is
another related problem: the library sacio.a, it can not be used on local
compiled programs. It is, I have several fortran programs made by my self
that work very well on a 32-bits PC, however, I can nnot compile then
on my AMD-64 bits PC.
An help, comment or suggestion?
Thanks,
JuanM
At 02:01 p.m. 19/10/2006, you wrote:
>Send sac-help mailing list submissions to
> sac-help at iris.washington.edu
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://www.iris.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/sac-help
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> sac-help-request at iris.washington.edu
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
> sac-help-owner at iris.washington.edu
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of sac-help digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: sac on 64-bit SMP box (Brian Savage)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:24:36 -0400
>From: Brian Savage <savage at uri.edu>
>Subject: Re: [SAC-HELP] sac on 64-bit SMP box
>To: schutt at uwyo.edu
>Cc: sac-help at iris.washington.edu
>Message-ID: <E05CD6F3-9657-454C-8C65-A6D0D0D4E920 at uri.edu>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
>Derek,
>
>That is really good to know.
>If you have any problems, send them to the sac-help list.
>
>Cheers,
>Brian
>
>On Oct 18, 2006, at 1:15 PM, Derek wrote:
>
> > For what it's worth, I just got the binary and it seems to work fine.
> > -Derek
> >
> > On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 11:21 -0400, Derek Schutt wrote:
> >> Hi Brian,
> >>
> >> Thanks for your quick response. I actually read that posting (by
> >> you I
> >> think?) in the archives, and it's clear that my post was lacking in
> >> information. In the directory containing the SAC makefile, I
> >> linked cc
> >> to gcc32 ("ln -s gcc32 cc"), which presumably would compile it at a
> >> 32-bit binary. However, I run into the problem below with the X11
> >> library. My guess is that I'd need to compile this library with
> >> gcc32
> >> too?
> >>
> >> I don't have the precompiled binary, but have just requested it
> >> and will
> >> post back when I get it and see if it works.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Derek
> >>
> >> On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 10:29 -0400, Brian Savage wrote:
> >>> Derek,
> >>>
> >>> There was a posting for me about sac on 64 bit machines, in
> >>> particular linux. If follows here.
> >>>
> >>> <snip>
> >>> SAC is not supported on 64 bit environments, and it will produce
> >>> unexpected results.
> >>>
> >>> I would not say it was a bug, but I would say there are things in
> >>> the
> >>> SAC code which are not portable between 32 and 64 bit systems.
> >>> These
> >>> things need to be attended to.
> >>>
> >>> You should be able to run a 32 bit binary on a 64 bit system.
> >>> <snip>
> >>>
> >>> Two things in specific, the declaration of the sac header on 32 and
> >>> 64 bit machines results in different file sizes, and many function
> >>> calls are using non-portable, 32 to 64 bit, declaration of pointers.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Brian
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Oct 17, 2006, at 5:46 PM, Derek wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm hoping to install sac on a linux box running 64bit SMP linux
> >>>>
> >>>>> uname -a
> >>>>
> >>>> Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.15-1.1833_FC4smp #1 SMP Wed
> >>>> Mar
> >>>> 1 23:55:52 EST 2006 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> >>>>
> >>>> but, in reading the archives of this mail list, it seems SAC won't
> >>>> work
> >>>> in 64-bit mode, and indeed, when I compile the source version I
> >>>> have
> >>>> (05Mar01.sac.tgz), it fails. Although, it seems to fail because it
> >>>> can't find or can't make a proper X11 library:
> >>>>
> >>>> [snip from "make" output]
> >>>> cc -w -DLINUX -o ../bin/sac \
> >>>> main/sac.o ../lib/sac.a ../lib/libevresp.a ../lib/
> >>>> libSMnonOracleFuncs.a ../lib/libSacOracleStubFuncs.a -L/usr/
> >>>> X11R6/
> >>>> lib -lX11 -lm -lnsl -ldl
> >>>> /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so
> >>>> when
> >>>> searching for -lX11
> >>>> /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.a
> >>>> when
> >>>> searching for -lX11
> >>>> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lX11
> >>>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> >>>> make[1]: *** [SAC] Error 1
> >>>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/sac/src'
> >>>> gmake: *** [all] Error 2
> >>>>
> >>>> Can any one tell me if I should request a 32-bit binary, or if
> >>>> there is
> >>>> a way to compile it to make it work?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>> Derek
> >>>> Univ. Wyoming
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> sac-help mailing list
> >>>> sac-help at iris.washington.edu
> >>>> http://www.iris.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/sac-help
> >>>
> > _______________________________________________
> > sac-help mailing list
> > sac-help at iris.washington.edu
> > http://www.iris.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/sac-help
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>sac-help mailing list
>sac-help at iris.washington.edu
>http://www.iris.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/sac-help
>
>
>End of sac-help Digest, Vol 16, Issue 7
>***************************************
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.6/486 - Release Date: 19/10/2006
--
Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner
en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos,
y se considera que está limpio.
MailScanner agradece a transtec Computers por su apoyo.
More information about the sac-help
mailing list