[SAC-HELP] differences in instrument response

[Milton P. Plasencia Linares]

Hi Yannik,

Please, take into account the Correction time delay in the Response file,

milton at macton:Downloads $ cat RESP.NZ.CRLZ.10.HHZ | grep Correction
B057F08     Correction applied (seconds):          0.000000E+00
B057F08     Correction applied (seconds):          6.234400E-03
B057F08     Correction applied (seconds):          3.975000E-02
B057F08     Correction applied (seconds):          1.187500E-01
B057F08     Correction applied (seconds):          2.375000E-01

the total delay is: 4.0223438e-01 s

I wait this help you,

Milton

**********************************
Milton P. PLASENCIA LINARES

Dipartimento Centro di Ricerche Sismologiche
Istituto Nazionale di Oceanografia e di Geofisica Sperimentale - OGS

Borgo Grotta Gigante 42/C
(34010) Sgonico - TRIESTE - ITALIA
Tel: +39-040-2140136
Fax: +39-040-327307

E-mail: mplasencia at ogs.trieste.it

ASAIN (Antarctic Seismographic Argentinean Italian Network)
*********************************


Quoting "Yannik Behr" <yannik.behr at vuw.ac.nz>:

> Hi,
>
> I am removing the instrument response first using a pole-zero file (SAC
> format) and then a RESP file (both extracted from the same DatalessSEED
> volume). The resulting traces show a phase shift of around 0.5 s. Is
> there anything wrong with the way I'm correcting for the instrument
> response? I have attached the script that I used to test this.
>
> Best,
> Yannik
>
>
> -- 
> Yannik Behr
> PhD Student in Seismology
> School of Geography, Environment, and Earth Sciences
> Victoria University of Wellington
> P.O. Box 600
> Wellington 6015
> New Zealand
>
> yannik.behr at vuw.ac.nz
>
> ph. +64 (4) 463 5233 8369
> fax.+64 (4) 463 5186
>
> -- 
> This email was Anti Virus checked by INOGS Antivirus filter.
>



----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.