[SAC-HELP] Response file confusion
Rob Porritt
rob at seismo.berkeley.edu
Wed Mar 14 12:10:08 PDT 2012
Hi,
You can use the timespan information to see a change of instrument in
2001 and then again in 2004. I suspect the network operators for the
ANZA array would have more information, but for practical purposes the
important issue is to use the response which is spanning the same time
as your data.
see blocks:
B052F22 Start date: 2000,264,20:11:00
B052F23 End date: 2001,250,20:49:00
and
B052F22 Start date: 2004,056,18:43:30
B052F23 End date: No Ending Time
Cheers,
Rob
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Tien-Huei Wang <twang024 at ucr.edu> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I 've been using broadband data from IRIS on research and recently
> encounter a confusing thing about response.
> I am using the BH* channels of network AZ, and it should be velocity data. I
> downloaded sac files from SCEC stp.
> I originally request response file in SEED format, then extracted it to be
> RESP.AZ.XXX..BHX, the response file.
> Recently, because I want to confirm the amplitudes in velocity and also in
> displacement is correct, I went to IRIS SeismiQuery to get the response file
> updated until 2011. Surprisingly, the extracted response file from my SEED
> format and the response file from SeismiQuery are different.
> The RDSEED extracted response file has 2 zeros and 5 poles, but the response
> file from SeismiQuery has 5 zeros 9 poles.
> I thought 2 zeros is standard for velocity response, had no idea what the 5
> zeros are. They are from the same time span for same station.
>
> Post front portion of RESP files
> 1. from RDSEED:
> =================================
> # << IRIS SEED Reader, Release 4.7.5 >>
> #
> # ======== CHANNEL RESPONSE DATA ========
> B050F03 Station: RDM
> B050F16 Network: AZ
> B052F03 Location: ??
> B052F04 Channel: BHE
> B052F22 Start date: 2004,056,18:43:30
> B052F23 End date: No Ending Time
> # =======================================
> # +
> +--------------------------------------------+ +
> # + | Response (Poles & Zeros), RDM ch BHE
> | +
> # +
> +--------------------------------------------+ +
> #
> B053F03 Transfer function type: A [Laplace Transform
> (Rad/sec)]
> B053F04 Stage sequence number: 1
> B053F05 Response in units lookup: M/S - velocity in meters
> per second
> B053F06 Response out units lookup: V - emf in volts
> B053F07 A0 normalization factor: 5.91892E+07
> B053F08 Normalization frequency: 0.159155
> B053F09 Number of zeroes: 2
> B053F14 Number of poles: 5
> # Complex zeroes:
> # i real imag real_error imag_error
> B053F10-13 0 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
> B053F10-13 1 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
> # Complex poles:
> # i real imag real_error imag_error
> B053F15-18 0 -3.701000E-02 3.701000E-02 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
> B053F15-18 1 -3.701000E-02 -3.701000E-02 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
> B053F15-18 2 -2.513000E+02 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
> B053F15-18 3 -1.310000E+02 4.673000E+02 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
> B053F15-18 4 -1.310000E+02 -4.673000E+02 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00
>
>
> 2. from SeismiQuery
> ======================================
>
> ###################################################################################
> #
> B050F03 Station: RDM
> B050F16 Network: AZ
> B052F03 Location: ??
> B052F04 Channel: BHE
> B052F22 Start date: 2000,264,20:11:00
> B052F23 End date: 2001,250,20:49:00
> #
> # +-----------------------------------+
> # | Response (Poles and Zeros) |
> # | AZ RDM BHE |
> # | 09/20/2000 to 09/07/2001 |
> # +-----------------------------------+
> #
> B053F03 Transfer function type: A
> B053F04 Stage sequence number: 1
> B053F05 Response in units lookup: M/S - velocity in meters
> per second
> B053F06 Response out units lookup: V - emf in volts
> B053F07 A0 normalization factor: +5.74357E+12
> B053F08 Normalization frequency: +2.00000E-01
> B053F09 Number of zeroes: 5
> B053F14 Number of poles: 9
> # Complex zeroes:
> # i real imag real_error imag_error
> B053F10-13 0 +0.00000E+00 +0.00000E+00 +0.00000E+00 +0.00000E+00
> B053F10-13 1 +0.00000E+00 +0.00000E+00 +0.00000E+00 +0.00000E+00
> B053F10-13 2 -1.51500E+01 +0.00000E+00 +0.00000E+00 +0.00000E+00
> B053F10-13 3 -3.18600E+02 +4.01200E+02 +0.00000E+00 +0.00000E+00
> B053F10-13 4 -3.18600E+02 -4.01200E+02 +0.00000E+00 +0.00000E+00
> # Complex poles:
> # i real imag real_error imag_error
> B053F15-18 0 -3.70000E-02 +3.70000E-02 +0.00000E+00 +0.00000E+00
> B053F15-18 1 -3.70000E-02 -3.70000E-02 +0.00000E+00 +0.00000E+00
> B053F15-18 2 -1.59900E+01 +0.00000E+00 +0.00000E+00 +0.00000E+00
> ...
>
>
> Does anyone know why and how this will affect our final outcome? What are
> the outputs and will they be consistent?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --Tien
>
> _______________________________________________
> sac-help mailing list
> sac-help at iris.washington.edu
> http://www.iris.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/sac-help
>
--
Rob Porritt, GG
UC Berkeley Earth and Planetary Sciences PhD Candidate
Berkeley Seismological Laboratory
http://seismo.berkeley.edu/~rob/
More information about the sac-help
mailing list